Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Alto F.'s avatar

(Reposting because Substack erased my comment lol)

I appreciate the article, but I'm going to be that guy and say "It's just a plane bro." I'm a Sagan-level skeptic on this phenomenon and I personally believe it is an example of mass hysteria. My background: planespotter for a decade, pilot for over half that.

In my opinion people are,

1. Looking up and comprehending what's above them (at night) for the first time in a long time

2. Comprehending with motivated reasoning influenced by mass/social media

3. Attempting to comprehend using the poor imaging on their recording devices

This is all affected by the difficult task of perceiving moving objects at a far distance and high altitudes at night, which the human eye is very much not designed to do. Even commercial airline pilots can fall victims to visual illusions in darkness.

I personally have not seen any video or image that cannot be reasonably explained as commercial or private aircraft. Even the videos in the Skojec article very clearly are planes to me, and I have not seen a video that has unexplainable movement of the aircraft.

if we are to consider sightings of actual drones, private drone activity in the area is more common than one might think, which could explain any actual witness. Another possibility is the private testing of commercial eVTOL aircraft which are quite large and appear rather droney.

While this might seem like a cop-out, I believe the overall government "inaction" can be explained by the reality that nothing is actually going on. Why the media is running with it and why some politicians/bureaucrats are so eager to involve themselves in it is another story that I will not choose to pursue here.

While I welcome opinions and discussion to the contrary, I would personally file this one under "Nothing Ever Happens."

I do appreciate that whatever these aircraft/helicopters/drones/UFOs/demons may be, they are complying with the FAA regulations on navigation lighting and landing lights while operating in some of the busiest airspace in the country (N90 NYC TRACON). Wouldn't want the earthlings to fine them for a violation, now would they?

(I hope I don't come across as overly impassioned about this, but I know many people who fly in this area and I would rather that the public calms down before an individual tries to take matters into their own hands and injures someone, or worse.)

(Note, this comment is about the mass psychological phenomenon that is currently happening within the northeast. Drones/objects over military bases and nuclear sites, and the military recorded UAP incidents are a different phenomena that has more grounding in reality. Both have occurred for a much longer time than this current subject, but the separate topics are now overlapping in the zeitgiest.)

Expand full comment
The Man Behind the Screen's avatar

This is going to seem like a non sequitur at first, but run with me on this.

In 2000, Warner Bros released a made for TV movie tie-in for Batman Beyond, the near-future follow-up to Batman: The Animated Series. That movie was titled "The Return of the Joker" and, as you might guess, featured a central mystery which involved the aging Bruce Wayne and the new Batman, Terry McGinnis, trying to figure out who this villain claiming to be the Joker really is. The reason why it's such a mystery is because the Joker supposedly died well before Bruce finally hung up his cape and cowl, killed by the person whom he last used to try and break the Bat: the third Robin, Tim Drake, whom the Joker methodically tortured and turned into Joker Jr.

As you might guess, this revelation sent Bruce into a rage, which the Joker then further stoked by showing him the "home movie" styled footage he had Harley Quinn film of him torturing and administering serums to Robin over the course of weeks. Bruce starts beating on him harder than he ever has before, and once he gets the chance, grabs Joker by the throat and tells him, "I'll break you in two."

Joker's response is to laugh at him. He's gripping Batman's wrist with his right hand, and tells him, "Oh, Brucey, if you had the guts for that kind of fun you'd have done it years ago!" As he speaks, he removes his hand and holds it out and up, almost as if waiting to catch something or grab something behind him. Bruce is expecting this, as we see him watching that hand, ready to act on whatever Joker's about to do. Joker, knowing Batman as well as he does, also knows Bruce will expect this, and does a little word play by finishing up with the phrase, "I on the other hand..."

At that point, he whips out a switch blade from the LEFT sleeve of his coat, slices Bruce in the ribs, stabs him in the leg, then punts him off the stack of crates where he was holding Joker. He wasn't just saying he was willing to go far enough to kill, he was literally telling Bruce he was looking in the wrong place as part of his grand joke. And he did this because he knew Bruce wouldn't listen. He was too angry, too disgusted by what Joker did to a young teenage boy that he not only promised to protect, but also allowed to put his life in danger to fight crime in Gotham.

People could learn a lot from that minute or two of animation. One key lesson? No matter how smart you might be, with the right setup and the tugging of the right emotional strings, anyone - absolutely ANYONE - can be fooled.

Expand full comment
15 more comments...

No posts